ABSTRACT
Previous studies have demonstrated that low-intensity intervention is effective in improving mental health in young people. Whilst interventions have majorly been offered online during COVID-19 pandemic, it is not known whether low-intensity interventions delivered online can also help reduce the level of distress experienced by young people. The study aimed to determine whether a low-intensity online intervention (LiON) can reduce levels of distress in young people greater than those in similar initial distress levels but received no intervention. Young people aged 15 to 24 were recruited for the 4-weekly LiON intervention consisting of three modules namely sleep and relaxation, stress-coping and problem-solving. The reductions in distress level after intervention were compared to those that occurred over a period of 3 months among community young people with similar baseline K6 distress levels. Seventy-four young people (mean age 20.24 [SD 2.26] years, 71.6% female) received the LiON intervention from December 2021 to July 2022. We observed a greater improvement in their distress levels after receiving the intervention than those with no intervention in the community (beta -4.13, 95%CI -5.12, -3.07, p < .001, Cohen's f2 0.027). The findings offered evidence that the LiON intervention significantly reduced young people's distress level in addition to the improvement that may occur naturally. The use of LiON is adaptable to a wider variety of frontline community organizations. Future evaluation of its cost-effectiveness is warranted.
ABSTRACT
The traditional de novo drug discovery is time consuming, costly and in some instances the drugs will fail to treat the disease which result in a huge loss to the organization. Drug repurposing is an alternative drug discovery process to overcome the limitations of the De novo drug discovery process. Ithelps for the identification of drugs to the rare diseases as well as in the pandemic situationwithin short span of time in a cost-effective way. The underlying principle of drug repurposing is that most of the drugs identified on a primary purpose have shown to treat other diseases also. One such example is Tocilizumab is primarily used for rheumatoid arthritis and it is repurposed to treat cancer and COVID-19. At present, nearly30% of the FDA approved drugs to treat various diseases are repurposed drugs. The drug repurposing is either drug-centric or disease centric and can be studied by using both experimental and in silico studies. The in silico repurpose drug discovery process is more efficient as it screens thousands of compounds from the diverse libraries within few days by various computational methods like Virtual screening, Docking, MD simulations,Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), etc. with certain limitations.These limitationscan be addressed by effective integration of advanced technologies to identify a novel multi-purpose drug.Copyright © 2023, Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To understand changes to granting access to novel vaccines by NITAG and payers and how prevention has become a focus in many markets Methods: Secondary research by studying various NITAG documents and published articles followed by primary research with experts in EU4 and UK Results: For NITAG recommendations, disease burden, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, followed by Epidemiology and mathematical modelling are conducted by most Western countries. Published studies on efficacy, effectiveness and reactogenicity are considered as key reference. UK specifically takes into account health economic modelling outputs. Recommendations in other markets are also considered in making local decisions. For vaccine funding payers consider the efficacy, durability and dosing regimen as key drivers, followed by aspects of strain coverage, formulation and storage. Platform were not considered by payers, while physicians considered it to be very important. For cost containment reasons, many NITAGs issue a recommendation for a narrow patient population Payers in all markets indicated that there is focus or prioritization of prevention strategies from ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and are likely to remain. UK for instance has increased its prevention budgets;however, this does not mean there is higher willingness to pay. In Germany there is no ring-fenced prevention specific budget. Conclusion(s): Severity of the disease is an important criterion in assessing the burden, an influential factor in vaccine decision making. In all countries in focus, Payers anticipate that the evaluation of new vaccines launched post-COVID-19 to be faster. Structural changes in Italy (restructure of AIFA and new NITAG) and UK (new public health agency), add to uncertainties on timelines. The length of the evaluation process will depends mainly on pre-work done with availability of local data on burden, epidemiology, and cost-effectiveness modelling.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Telemedicine is a modality which utilizes technology to provide and support health care across large distances. It has redefined the practices of medicine in many specialties and continues to be a boon for clinicians on many frontiers. Its role in the branch of anesthesia remains largely unexplored but has shown to be beneficial in all the three phases: pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative. Now time has come that anesthesiologists across the globe reassess their strategies and utilize the telemedicine facilities in the field of anesthesia.Copyright © 2021 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: We estimated the cost-effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), vaccines, and the combination of NPI and vaccines in managing the COVID pandemic. Method(s): A dynamic transmission model was constructed to simulate the incidence of COVID infections and deaths among community-dwelling Singapore residents. Using this model, we compared the cost and outcomes of NPI (border control measures, safe distancing and mask wearing) versus no NPI in an unvaccinated and a vaccinated population. The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective over a one year time horizon, with data based on the COVID situation in Singapore during Jan 2021 to Dec 2021. Costs of vaccination, adverse events, masks, self-testing using rapid antigen tests, test-trace-isolate (TTI), outpatient visits, hospitalization, productivity loss and reduced sales receipt from retail and food and beverages industries were included. Health loss from adverse events, TTI and COVID infection and deaths were also included. Result(s): Among the scenarios compared, vaccination combined with NPIs yield the lowest cost (S$7.6 billion), while no vaccination with NPIs had the highest costs (S$49.1 billion). The largest loss in QALYs from the population was seen from the scenario without vaccination or NPIs. Using a dominance approach, vaccination combined with NPIs is cost saving with an ICER of -S$213 billion per QALY, compared to no vaccination with lockdown measures. The results show that NPIs alone without vaccination only delays transmission, but does not significantly change the total number of cases observed in the population. Vaccination is both cost saving and health saving as the difference in cases averted from vaccination and their associated costs, is far greater than the additional costs required to vaccinate the public. Conclusion(s): Both vaccination and NPI are critical strategies for managing the COVID pandemic. In the presence of vaccine, NPIs continue to offer benefits in terms of reduced number of infections and deaths.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The COVID19 pandemic caused over six million deaths worldwide as of 2022 and made necessary the rapid development of vaccines. The objective of this Systematic Literature Review is to summarise the main evidence from economic evaluations of vaccines against COVID19. Method(s): Searches were conducted on PubMed on July 13th 2022. The selected papers considered COVID19 vaccination scenarios without population limits. The types of study design examined were cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses. Result(s): Overall, 16 articles from an initial list of 1842 were included in this review. Out of the 16 models, there were five Markov cohort models (three of them were combined with a decision tree model), four dynamic transmission models, three microsimulation models, three epidemiological models (without further information on the model structure) and one decision tree model. Model characteristics were considerably consistent between high-, middle- or low-income countries. Five studies considered both the healthcare and societal perspective, while seven studies reported only the former, and one only the latter. Two studied did not specify the study perspective. Ten of the studies did not consider any level of herd immunity, and no study considered cross-protection. Although eight studies used "naive" comparisons between vaccines, none of the studies conducted thorough indirect treatment comparison. All the models suggest that vaccines are cost-effective as they prevent death and transmission, and reduce the severity of cases. Although the sources of effectiveness estimates were always stated, the details of those studies were rarely reported. Nevertheless, the outcome measures and the key parameters used in the models were generally clearly stated and justified. Conclusion(s): This SLR highlights several challenges for conducting Health Economic evaluations of COVID19 vaccines. The quality of the models and their estimates suffered from the very fast pace of COVID19 research. Therefore, economic evidence on vaccination programs requires additional rigorous research.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Various interventions were used to control the COVID-19 pandemic and protect population health, including vaccination, medication and nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). This study aims to examine the cost-effectiveness of different combinations of NPIs (including social distancing, mask wearing, tracing-testing-isolation, mass testing, and lockdown), oral medicine (Paxlovid), and vaccination (including two-dose and three-dose vaccination) under the Delta and Omicron pandemic in China. Method(s): We constructed a Markov model using a SIRI structure with a one-week cycle length over one-year time horizon to estimate the cost-effectiveness of different combinations in China from societal perspective. Effectiveness of interventions, disease transition probabilities and costs were from published data, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and net monetary benefits were calculated for one-year time horizon. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. Scenario analysis was developed to examine different situations under the Omicron pandemic. Result(s): Under the Delta pandemic, implementing the combination of social distancing, mask wearing, mass testing and three-dose vaccination was the optimal strategy, with cost at $11165635.33 and utility of 94309.94 QALYs, and had 60% probability of being cost-effective compared with other strategies. Three-dose vaccination combinations were better than two-dose combinations. Under the Omicron pandemic, antigen testing was better than nucleic testing by avoiding cross infections;second, adding Paxlovid or lockdown to the combined intervention strategies could increase limited health outcomes at huge cost and thus were not cost-effective;last, encouraging patients to stay at home can save societal costs compared with concentrated quarantine at hospitals. Conclusion(s): Three-dose vaccination and self-quarantine of asymptomatic and mild cases can save total costs. Under the Omicron pandemic outbreak, antigen testing is a better way to control the pandemic, and adding Paxlovid or lockdown to intervention combinations is not cost-effective.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Pertussis, a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by Bordetella pertussis, is endemic in Brazil, but is underdiagnosed in adults due to atypical symptomatology and limited diagnosis time window. Brazil's Ministry of Health recommends decennial boosters in adults against diphtheria and tetanus, but not pertussis. After the COVID-19 pandemic, infectious diseases surged worldwide due to lack of natural exposure and reduced immunization coverage. Asthma and COPD populations are at increased risk of pertussis infection. This study assessed the cost-utility of decennial pertussis vaccination with Tdap vaccine versus no pertussis vaccination in Brazil's adult asthma and COPD populations in a high-incidence context. Method(s): A static cross-sectional population-based cost-utility model of decennial Tdap boosters in asthma patients >=50 years and COPD patients >=40 years was developed from the payer's perspective. Pertussis incidence from Sao Paulo's state surveillance system in the peak year 2014 was adjusted for underdiagnosis and relative risk of pertussis in asthma and COPD populations. Vaccine efficacy and coverage, and costs and outcomes discounted at 5%, were obtained from the literature and public databases. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were run, including alternative annual incidence. Result(s): In the asthma population, Tdap boosters would incur 7,065,788 Brazilian reais (BRL) direct costs and save 32.85 Life Years (LYs) and 262.13 Quality-Adjusted LYs (QALYs). In the COPD population, Tdap boosters would incur 41,102,844 BRL direct costs and save 157.47 LYs and 1,078.26 QALYs. Discounted incremental cost-utility ratios were 26,956 and 38,120 BRL/QALY in asthma and COPD populations, respectively. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 Gross Domestic Product (GDP)/capita, 85.8% and 49.7% of simulations were cost-effective in asthma and COPD populations, respectively, while all simulations were cost-effective at a threshold of 3 GDP/capita. Conclusion(s): Implementing decennial Tdap boosters for adult asthma and COPD patients should be considered, given the favorable cost-utility profile in peak-incidence years.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Early Intervention in Psychosis services improve outcomes for young people with psychosis but a significant proportion disengage with potential costs to their mental health. Method(s): This study evaluated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the EYE-2 intervention, a motivational engagement intervention, delivered by EIP clinicians, compared to standardized EIP (sEIP) in a cluster RCT in 20 EIP teams in 5 sites across England. Participants were 1027 young people with first episode psychosis. The primary outcome was time to disengagement. Economic outcomes were NHS mental health and wider societal costs, clinical and social outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Result(s): The adjusted hazard ratio for EYE-2 + sEIP versus sEIP alone was 1.07, (95% CI 0.76 to 1.49;p = .713). Disengagement was 16% with no observed differences between arms for any secondary outcomes. The health economic evaluation indicated lower average mental health costs [-543 (95% CI -2715 to 1628)] and marginally improved mental health states, with a 63% probability of the EYE-2 intervention being dominant in cost-effectiveness compared to usual care. There were very tentative indications of lower societal costs and better social outcomes with 30 more days per year spent in education and training (95% CI 1.52 to 53.68;probability positive outcome for the intervention: 99%) in a sub-sample of 22% of participants. Conclusion(s): Cost-effectiveness analyses revealed estimates in the direction of dominance of EYE-2, but 95% confidence limits ruled out a reduction of more than 24% in the risk of disengagement. Implementation, fidelity and COVID-19 impacts are discussed.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Mucormycosis is a rare invasive fungal infection with high lethality, affecting mainly patients with hematological neoplasia, decompensated diabetes, and covid-19 infection. The aim was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of liposomal Amphotericin B (standard treatment) versus isavuconazole for treating mucormycosis in the consolidation phase from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Method(s): A decision tree model was built. The analysis considered the costs of the treatment over a six-month time horizon. This included hospitalization during the entire course of treatment and the expenditures related to dialysis, complication occurring in 5% (3%-6%) of cases treated with the Amphotericin B. Appointments with specialists were included in the isavuconazole arm, and amphotericin B was used if the patient failed to respond to isavuconazole. The utility of the patient with mucormycosis, cured and with renal failure was estimated. Uncertainties were assessed through probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Result(s): The average cost of amphotericin B and isavuconazole arm was R$1.054.874,39 and R$522.344,05, respectively. The utility was 0.479 with amphotericin B and 0.480 with isavuconazole. The ICER was R$ -684,494,237 (dominant). In deterministic sensitivity analysis, the probability of dialysis was the variable with the greatest impact. In probabilistic analysis, the ICER is distributed in the right and left lower quadrant, the acceptability curve for all the scenarios analyzed is favorable for isavuconazole. The budget impact suggests a potential savings of between R$ 350 million and R$ 415 million over five years. Conclusion(s): The treatment of mucormycosis during the consolidation phase with isavuconazole represents a lower cost, besides the convenience of oral treatment and reduced incidence of severe adverse events, with mortality similar to the Amphotericin B arm. In Brazil, the formulation of posaconazole approved is inadequate for treating mucormycosis during the consolidation phase, therefore isavuconazole is the single oral drug available.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Compared to nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs (N/OPS-VTM), non-invasive saliva samples have enormous potential for scalability and routine population screening of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we investigate the efficacy of saliva samples relative to N/OPS-VTM for use as a direct source for RT-PCR based SARS-CoV-2 detection. Method(s): We collected paired nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva samples from suspected positive SARS-CoV-2 patients and tested using RT-PCR. We used generalized linear models to investigate factors that explain result agreement. Further, we used simulations to evaluate the effectiveness of saliva-based screening in restricting the spread of infection in a large campus such as an educational institution. Result(s): We observed a 75.4% agreement between saliva and N/OPS-VTM, that increased drastically to 83% in samples stored for less than three days. Such samples processed within two days of collection showed 74.5% test sensitivity. Our simulations suggest that a test with 75% sensitivity, but high daily capacity can be very effective in limiting the size of infection clusters in a workspace. Guided by these results, we successfully implemented a saliva-based screening in the Bangalore Life Sciences Cluster (BLiSC) campus. Conclusion(s): These results suggest that saliva may be a viable alternate source for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance if samples are processed immediately. Although saliva shows slightly lower sensitivity levels when compared to N/OPS-VTM, saliva collection is logistically advantageous. We strongly recommend the implementation of saliva-based screening strategies for large workplaces and in schools, as well as for population-level screening and routine surveillance as we learn to live with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Copyright © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To describe the use of economic evaluation to update the antigens dispensed by the Colombian Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) from 2000 and 2021. Method(s): a review of economic evaluation of vaccines (EEV) studies conducted by the Expanded Program of Immunization in Colombia between 2000 and 2021. A literature search was carried out in different databases complemented with information obtained from different stakeholders who participated in the updating process. Result(s): In 2000, sponsored by the Pan-American Health Office of the World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), was conducted the cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against Hemophilus influenzae type b was the first economic evaluation of vaccines (EEV) conducted ever in Colombia. Between 2005 and 2007, 4 EEV (Rotavirus, Heptavalent Pneumococcus, Influenza and Hepatitis A) were carried out in order to inform the decision process at local level in Bogota DC, the Colombian capital. Between 2007 and 2010, the Ministry of Health sponsored 8 EEV (Rotavirus, 7- and 10-valent pneumococcus, Influenza, Hepatitis A, chickenpox, tetanus in men, and HPV) which were used to decide about the introduction of new vaccines at national level. Subsequently, with the support of PAHO's PROVAC initiative, Colombia went from having 6 EPI vaccines in the 1990s, to 21 EPI vaccines that currently protect against 29 diseases, not including the vaccines used against COVID-19 which Colombia have been using since March 2021. Conclusion(s): Colombia has been one of the middle-income countries with the highest number of vaccines included in its EPI in the last 20 years and the use of the EEV has been essential for decision-making.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Health technology assessment (HTA) organizations vary in terms of how they conduct assessments. We assess whether and to what extent HTA bodies have adopted societal and novel elements of value in their economic evaluations. METHODS: After categorizing "societal" and "novel" elements of value, we reviewed fifty-three HTA guidelines. We collected data on whether each guideline mentioned each societal or novel element of value, and if so, whether the guideline recommended the element's inclusion in the base case, sensitivity analysis, or qualitative discussion in the HTA. RESULTS: The HTA guidelines mention on average 5.9 of the twenty-one societal and novel value elements we identified (range 0-16), including 2.3 of the ten societal elements and 3.3 of the eleven novel value elements. Only four value elements (productivity, family spillover, equity, and transportation) appear in over half of the HTA guidelines, whereas thirteen value elements are mentioned in fewer than one-sixth of the guidelines, and two elements receive no mention. Most guidelines do not recommend value element inclusion in the base case, sensitivity analysis, or qualitative discussion in the HTA. CONCLUSIONS: Ideally, more HTA organizations will adopt guidelines for measuring societal and novel value elements, including analytic considerations. Importantly, simply recommending in guidelines that HTA bodies consider novel elements may not lead to their incorporation into assessments or ultimate decision making.
Subject(s)
Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Cost-Benefit AnalysisABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the scope of health economics literature, which will increasingly examine value beyond health care interventions such as government policy and broad health system innovations. Aim: The study analyzes economic evaluations and methodologies evaluating government policies suppressing or mitigating transmission and reducing COVID-19, broad health system innovations, and models of care. This can facilitate future economic evaluations and assist government and public health policy decisions during pandemics. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used. Methodological quality was quantified using the scoring criteria in European Journal of Health Economics, Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Checklist and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) Cost Benefit Analysis Checklist. PUBMED, Medline, and Google Scholar were searched from 2020-2021. Results: Cost utility analysis (CUA) and cost benefit analysis (CBA) analyzing mortality, morbidity, quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, national income loss, and value of production effectively evaluate government policies suppressing or mitigating COVID-19 transmission, disease, and impacting national income loss. The WHO's pandemic economic framework facilitates economic evaluations of social and movement restrictions. Social return on investment (SROI) links benefits to health and broader social improvements. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) can facilitate vaccine prioritization, equitable health access, and technology evaluation. Social welfare function (SWF) can account for social inequalities and population-wide policy impact. It is a generalization of CBA, and operationally, it is equal to an equity-weighted CBA. It can provide governments with a guideline for achieving the optimal distribution of income, which is vital during pandemics. Economic evaluations of broad health system innovations and care models addressing COVID-19 effectively use cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) that utilize decision trees and Monte Carlo models, and CUAs that effectively utilize decision trees and Markov models, respectively. Conclusion: These methodologies are very instructive for governments, in addition to their current use of CBA and the value of a statistical life analytical tool. CUA and CBA effectively evaluate government policies suppressing or mitigating COVID-19 transmission, disease, and impacts on national income loss. CEA and CUA effectively evaluate broad health system innovations and care models addressing COVID-19. The WHO's framework, SROI, MCDA, and SWF can also facilitate government decision-making during pandemics. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01919-z.
ABSTRACT
Intro: Uptake of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs) for self-testing has been high following authorisation by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). However, there are no published Australian data assessing feasibility and compliance with home-based rapid antigen testing. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of daily rapid antigen self-testing. Method(s): We prospectively recruited a cohort of hospital employees and students from primary and secondary school to perform daily self-testing using RATs in the home over 14 consecutive days. Participants consenting to the study were supplied with 15 Roche SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Nasal Self Tests, 3 saliva swabs for self-collection for RT-PCR and were asked to record results and answer a daily survey using a smartphone application. Finding(s): 38% (26/68) of the cohort were compliant to 14 consecutive days of testing;this was significantly higher in students (71%) than hospital employees (28%). The median number of tests performed over 14 consecutive days was 11 and time to first missed test was a median 5.5 days. The most common reasons for missing days were "I forgot" (37.5%) and "too busy" (8.9%). Ease of self- nasal swabbing, self-nasal testing. performing the test and using the app were rated as comfortable/very comfortable in over 80% of the cohort. Discussion(s): Most study participants in this Australian cohort were compliant with frequent home-based RATs. By study end most participants (93.8%) found the testing process acceptable/very acceptable. There is need for further work on the cost-effectiveness and impact of self-tested RATs under a range of specific uses and conditions. Conclusion(s): This study provided valuable information on acceptability and feasibility of regular home-based testing which could be applied to other diseases. Ongoing community engagement with clear information on RATs including accuracy and use cases is important for decision-making and addressing concerns, particularly for linguistically diverse peoples.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
This study aims to investigate the reaction of COVID-19 cases (confirmed, deaths, recovered, & active) on twelve sectors of Indian economy by using sectoral indices of national stock exchange. Daily frequency of COVID-19 case categories was obtained from Worldometer from January 30, 2020 to June 30, 2020 and dataset of daily closing prices of twelve sectoral indices (auto, banks, financial services, fast moving consumer goods, information technology, media, metal, oil & gas, pharmaceutical, public sector banks, private banks, realty sector) was obtained from national stock exchange web portal for the same period as of COVID-19. In this study, the ordinary least square regression was used to study the significance of COVID-19 cases (confirmed, deaths, recovered, & active) on twelve sectoral indices. Empirical evidence suggested no significant impact of COVID-19 cases on daily returns of twelve major sectors represented by sectoral indices except in the case of pharmaceutical sector, where daily growth in number of deaths is impacting daily returns on pharmaceutical sectoral index in a positive way. The twelve sectoral indices went into a downward spiral at the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, but as government and central bank introduced various policy measures, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sectoral indices faded away.Copyright © 2020 Ubiquity Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 pandemic has caused havoc worldwide. India is also facing challenging circumstances as the figure of infected/positive cases is rising day by day. This study deals with the development of education: Post COVID-19. This paper will help to understand "Digital Education: Opportunities and Threats". The Corona virus has exposed emerging vulnerabilities in learning systems all over the world. A lot of relevant literature was explored to confine the essence of continued learning during these exceptional times. Educational organizations all over the world are moving towards online/Digital learning. This paper also proposes digital education as an urgent need in this lock downs times and social distancing due to COVID-19 pandemic. It also provides a powerful stage for further research. The use of digital technology in education is experiencing a tremendous boom in education sector with cost effectiveness. Although it is unclear whether technology will plug all of the holes in the Indian Education system but it seems that technology is playing a major role in education interventions. Due to advancements in technology, accessibility of low-priced laptops/mobiles, wireless equipments, and related communications setups signs both opportunities and challenges for learning organizations and their faculty and students. Digital Education has potential that can produce knowledge workers. The government has analyzed that ICT sector has important role in education due to that many programmes such as NEOR, NMEICT, NKN, Eklavya, NPTEL, and NROER has been launched. Digital Education has bring success in the field of education but still there area number of challenges in most of Indian institutes like shortage of quality teachers, deprived quality of research, and deprived quality of training etc. Digital Education is overall very beneficial for the students of country like India.Copyright © 2020 Ubiquity Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: A need exists for safe, affordable, and effective antiviral treatments for less severe COVID-19 outpatients that can prevent infection progression, hospitalization, and death;shorten the time to clinical recovery;and reduce transmission. In our best knowledge, there are not, so far, costeffectiveness analysis on oral antiviral COVID-19 drugs in Spain. In our study we aim to evaluate cost-effectiveness of oral nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir in COVID-19 mild to moderate outpatients with at least one risk factor for disease progression in Spain. Method(s): A simulation model was constructed in R, to assess the clinical consequences and costs associated with COVID-19 in a hypothetical cohort of non-hospitalized patients older than 65 years with mild-to-moderate COVID and at least one risk factor for progression in Spain. The intervention assessed was nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir 300 mg plus 100mg every 12 hours up to 5 days. The comparator was symptomatic treatment with no antiviral drugs against SARSCoV- 2. The study was contextualized in the Spanish National Health System and the perspective of the service provider was adopted. Quality of life adjusted life years (QALYs) was used as a measure of effectiveness. Drug effectiveness was obtained from a literature review. As a cost measure, the retail price of the drugs was used. As a threshold willing to pay, the Spanish Gross National Product per capita was used. A discount of 3% per year was applied on future health effects. We used a decisional tree model. A univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Result(s): We found that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir yielded an extra 620.89 QALYs compared to a baseline scenario without it, at an increase in cost of 89,630,442 with an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 144,356.4 /QALY gained. One way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo simulations were undertaken and showed that the probability of not being costeffective was 1 at the current price and willingness to pay threshold. To meet our willingness to pay threshold, nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir 5-days treatment price should be lowered down to 70 . Conclusion(s): According to our analysis nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is not costeffective in in the Spanish National Health System for outpatients older than 65 years with at least one risk factor for COVID progression. A drug price of 70 per treatment would meet our willingness to pay threshold.
ABSTRACT
Over the last decade the trend of home-birth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) has remained consistent, with 2.4% of women giving birth at home in 2020.1 Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, maternity services have seen significant changes to visiting policies, delivery of services and the suspension of home-birth services across the UK.2 This paper will explore the evidence regarding the experiences of those women and birthing people who choose home birth, with the aim to identify women's reasons for choosing a home birth during the pandemic. Some dedicated home-birth teams reported increased referral rates for a home birth and an increase in the amount of home births throughout the initial wave. It is unclear why home-birth rates appeared to have increased in the UK during the pandemic, especially since women's access to home birth may have been limited.
ABSTRACT
Background: As COVID-19 cases persist, one potential intervention to reduce absenteeism in the workplace due to COVID-19 is to use rapid antigen diagnostics to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, routine testing in the workplace offers an avenue to reaching a large proportion of the population which could lead to a greater community impact beyond solely mitigating transmission events that occur in the workplace. We sought to identify the most cost-effective workplace testing strategies at the community level and within individual workplaces. Method(s): We used two models to understand how SARS-CoV-2 AgRDTs could best be implemented within the workplace to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. In our community-level dynamic transmission model, PATAT, we evaluated the impact of symptomatic testing and asymptomatic testing of a fixed proportion of the formally employed workforce on broader community transmission. We stratified runs by asymptomatic testing frequency, vaccine coverage, vaccine effectiveness, and Rt. Simulations were informed using demographic data from Georgia, Brazil, and the Netherlands. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using the results from each country and assumed a $2.50 total cost per test. Result(s): We observed a substantial decrease in the number of infections occurring in both the workplace and community when a SARS-CoV-2 AgRDTs strategy was implemented. Under all conditions, mandatory symptomatic testing and related quarantine from the workplace averted up to 72%, 79%, and 74% of community infections in Brazil, Georgia, and the Netherlands respectively. Limiting tests to symptomatic workers was always on the cost-effectiveness frontier, regardless of the vaccine coverage, efficacy, or Rt of the virus (Figure 1), at $2-$4 per workplace infection prevented. While asymptomatic testing was on the cost-effectiveness frontier, it would cost an additional $500-$6700 to prevent one additional workplace infection. The added benefit of routine asymptomatic testing was minimal until 100% of the workforce was reached. Conclusion(s): We found self-testing with AgRDTs for the formally employed workforce is both efficient at reducing workplace and community infections as well as cost-effective when targeting symptomatic individuals. Willingness to pay to avoid workplace absenteeism may differ by country, individual workplaces, and the perceived economic value of several workdays missed. If there is a higher willingness to pay, routine asymptomatic screening may be considered.